In India, women’s access and rights of ownership over family property (both moveable and immoveable), in the absence of a will, is governed by succession laws based on religion. Under Hindu law prior to 1937, a woman did not have the right to own any property at all, except what she received from her parents at the time of her wedding. The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was a breakthrough in terms of giving Hindu women a full and equal share of their husbands’ property as the children; yet, the male bias persisted. An amendment to this Act in 2005 took the progressive step of making daughters coparceners at par with sons, such that they receive an equal birthright to a share in the natal family’s ancestral property, i.e., parents’ property.
In December 2013, International Land Coalition (ILC) member Landesa Rural Development Institute and UN Women, India, prepared a report on the formal and informal barriers in the implementation of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 in the context of women agricultural producers of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh. The study is unique in a number of ways, especially given its focus on women as agricultural labourers, an explicit effort to ask women what they want, and an assessment of the overall awareness of all stakeholders on general awareness relating to this law.
Unfortunately, the studies conducted reveal several barriers to the implementation of the law. There are several formal barriers, such as continuing male bias in the law itself despite the amendments; for example, the devolution of a woman’s property still remains biased towards her husband’s heirs against her natal family. Further, Hindu women continue to be deprived of their inheritance through wills.
Additionally, there are informal barriers as well, in the form of social and cultural barriers. Women are generally forced to give up their share of their parents’ property in favor of their brothers for various reasons, such as the fear of breaking familial bonds. In traditional patriarchal societies, such as Haryana, local authorities brazenly deprive girls of their legal right to ancestral property.
The surveys conducted revealed number of key insights, suggesting that many women have yet to benefit from the legal changes introduced by the 2005 Amendment. The report notes that:
- Hindu social practice allows the parents to absolve themselves from honouring the daughter’s inheritance right at par with their sons with the alibi of paying dowry at the time of the daughter’s marriage. Dowry as a substitute of land and other properties in inheritance is one key way the patriarchal beliefs are deeply anchored in social practice, denying the women social and economic equality within the family. The practice of dowry is so entrenched that women themselves do not feel that it is their moral or legal right to claim inheritance rights in their parents’ property.
- Women’s understandings of the current inheritance law and of the claim processes are clearly rudimentary and fragmented. Land has historically been a male domain, and it continues to be so.
- Even when the women do receive land in inheritance, it is invariably much less than an equal share. Women are likely to get more land as widows than as daughters.
- The people and institutions that are mandated to enforce the law are prisoners of the same practice
- Even when women do get land in their own names by inheritance, through dowry, or through purchase by their marital family in their name (this is often done to take advantage of reduced stamp duty on property purchased in a woman’s name), the ownership by women is only notional. The women are seldom in possession of the land, title and the Record of Rights (ROR) that make it a secured tenure. The decision making power on use of the land remains firmly in the grip of men – father, brother, husband or father-in-law.
- There is a lack of political will on the part of the State governments to implement the law.