In 2010, the Conference of the Parties to
the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted the Aichi Biodiversity Targets
as part of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. Target 11 calls for
‘at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas and 10 per cent of
coastal and marine areas’ to be conserved by way of ‘well-connected systems of
protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures’. Yet four
years after their adoption, parties to the CBD and other rights- and
stakeholders have not received guidance about either what kinds of arrangements
do and do not constitute ‘other effective area-based conservation measures’, or
how best to appropriately recognise and support them.
This paper by Harry Jonas, Valentina Barbuto, Holly Jonas, Ashish Kothari, and Fred Nelson argues that without clear
guidance on the issue, conservation law and policy will continue to
inappropriately and/or inadequately recognise the great diversity of forms of
conservation and sustainable use of ecosystems and their constituent elements
across landscapes and seascapes, including by Indigenous peoples and local
communities.
In this context, and in line with calls
from the Convention on Biological Diversity and the IUCN, it proposes the
establishment of an IUCN Task Force to further explore the issues with a view
to developing clear guidance on ‘other effective area-based conservation
measures’ as a means to effectively and equitably achieve Aichi Biodiversity
Target 11. The full paper is available for download here.
No comments:
Post a Comment