One of the more significant and impactful
pieces of legislation, the Kenya Mining Bill 2014 was passed on its third
reading last week. The bill repeals the
former archaic remnant of a long-forgotten epoch, the Mining Act from 1940 and
still in force, which fails to adequately meet the current demands of the
emerging sector. The primary objective
of the bill is to consolidate all of the current laws related to mining. It also seeks to implement a number of
articles within Kenya’s Constitution pertaining to land management, respect for
the environment and agreements for natural resources.
As the bill stands, there are certain
concerns that still need to be addressed.
A major concern is the wide discretionary powers held by the Cabinet
Secretary, which belie transparency and good governance, though the latest
draft has attempted to create a body known as the Mineral Rights Board that
takes some powers, though minimal, away from the Cabinet Secretary. The definition of community in the bill is
also disconcerting. In the
Interpretation section of the bill, a community is defined as (a) a group of
people living around exploration and mining operations area; or (b) a group of
people who may be displaced from land intended for exploration and mining
operations. The definition, worryingly,
does not clarify what ‘around’ or ‘group’ means nor does it include other
communities who may still be affected by mining operations.
Another issue is the failure to include
provisions adequately dealing with consultation with communities in relation to
mining activities. There should be
consultation with communities in all aspects of the planning process according
to international law and best practices, however the bill is silent on this. The bill has provided for royalties to be
shared among the National Government –
70% to the County government – 20% and to the community where mining operations
occur – 10%. This is an improvement from
the previous allocation of 5% to communities. Finally, the Mining Bill outlines
the acquisition of community land without consent if the Cabinet Secretary
considers it to be contrary to national interest. This is a vague and arbitrary term. The bill fails to provide a solution for
communities who refuse to allow their land to be used for mining. Natural Justice shall continue to follow up
on the developments and discussions around this law with community members and
partners as it awaits presidential assent.
No comments:
Post a Comment